Friday, March 6, 2009

who knew?

We all thought Escher's work to be inexplicable until the recent discovery he was actually an economist.

Now I feel much better.

Mark McHugh - thanks, Lindsay!


Seraphine said...

haha. mc escher was no mc hammer. i mean that in the best possible (though obscure) way.
and poor economists don't get much love, do they? even though most economists recommend a balanced economy paired with a balanced budget.
but risk analysts certainly need to come up with new financial models, because the old one didn't quite work, did it?
to quasi/para-quote one of my favorite bloggers:
attacking the problem analytically, analysts discovered three distinct kinds of risk: the mythical, the chimerical, and the purely hypothetical. They were all, one might say, nonexistent, but each nonexisted in an entirely different way.

Suzi Riot said...

Hahaha! Yes, that explains it all!

Randal Graves said...

Oh great, now I'm going to be finding economic theories in Lautréamont's Maldoror and the Sporting News.

Lisa said...

I love these. Very clever.

susan said...

sera - If we go to sleep at night with $50 in our purse and a $kazillion dollars in the world and awake the next day to find $10kazillion in the world, how much is our $50 worth?

suzi - Does, don't it?

randal - Logical explanations are everywhere including inside the vegies I cut up for dinner.

lisa - Sad but true ;-)

Seraphine said...

for now, $50 is still worth $50.
but if one can stay current with their mortgage payments today, one might tomorrow pay the house off with those phony "skazillion" dollars instead of real ones.
it's called deleveraging.

linda said...

between this and your comments/ers, I am feeling out of the loop and so must research, as often seems to happen to me lately with economic stuff and escher now needs research too...I am just baffled tonight and really should just shut up!


lindsaylobe said...

I am sure all of the Economists got a chuckle out of (Mark McHugh‘s brilliant adaptation?) of the recent discovery of M. C. Escher’s art which proves he was actually an economist but in truth the Economists are all invariably thwarted by their political masters.

gfid said...

i'm a big Escher fan from way back.... so was he a number crunching economist, or a philosophical economist...? they're 2 different animals. not even the same species, i think.

susan said...

lindsay - Yes, it was Mark McHugh. I'd saved the picture but not the link so thanks very much. Somehow a funny economist sounds like a contradiction in terms, doesn't it?

gfid - 'a number crunching economist, or a philosophical economist?' In answer to your question my guess is that he was a futuristic economist.

Anonymous said...

手機遊戲,貼圖,A片下載,成人影城,愛情公寓,情色貼圖,情色,色情網站,色情遊戲,色情小說,情色文學,色情,aio交友愛情館,色情影片,臺灣情色網,寄情築園小遊戲,情色論壇,嘟嘟情人色網,情色視訊,愛情小說,言情小說,一葉情貼圖片區,情趣用品,情趣,色情漫畫,情色網,情色a片,情色遊戲,85cc成人片,嘟嘟成人網,成人網站,18成人,成人影片,成人交友網,成人貼圖,成人圖片區,成人圖片,成人文章,成人小說,成人光碟,微風成人區,免費成人影片,成人漫畫,成人文學,成人遊戲,成人電影,成人論壇,成人,做愛,aio,情色小說,ut聊天室,ut聊天室,豆豆聊天室,聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,080視訊聊天室,免費視訊聊天,哈啦聊天室,視訊聊天,080聊天室,080苗栗人聊天室,6k聊天室,視訊聊天室,成人聊天室,中部人聊天室,免費視訊,視訊交友,視訊美女,視訊做愛,正妹牆,美女交友,玩美女人,美女,美女寫真,美女遊戲,hi5,hilive,hi5 tv,a383,微風論壇,微風,伊莉